16 Techniques to Supercharge and Build Real-world RAG Systems—Part 1
Core Technical Concepts/Technologies Discussed:
- RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
- Vector Databases/Embeddings
- Query Transformation
- Hybrid Search
- Re-ranking
- Metadata Filtering
- Chunking Strategies
- LLM (Large Language Model) Optimization
Main Points:
-
Query Transformation:
- Techniques like HyDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings) and sub-queries improve retrieval by reformulating queries for better semantic matching.
- Example: Breaking a complex query into smaller, focused sub-questions.
-
Hybrid Search:
- Combines keyword-based (e.g., BM25) and vector-based search to balance precision and recall.
-
Re-ranking:
- Post-retrieval refinement using models like Cohere Rerank or cross-encoders to prioritize relevant documents.
-
Metadata Filtering:
- Leverages document metadata (e.g., date, author) to narrow search scope and improve relevance.
-
Chunking Strategies:
- Fixed-size chunks: Simple but may split context.
- Content-aware chunking: Uses natural boundaries (e.g., headings) for better coherence.
-
LLM Optimization:
- Prompt engineering (e.g., few-shot examples) and response structuring (e.g., JSON output) enhance answer quality.
Technical Specifications/Implementation Details:
- HyDE Implementation: Generate hypothetical answers to a query, embed them, and retrieve similar documents.
- Hybrid Search Example: Combine
BM25
(lexical) withcosine similarity
(semantic) scores. - Re-ranking Code Snippet:
from cohere import Client co = Client(api_key="YOUR_KEY") reranked_docs = co.rerank(query=query, documents=docs, top_n=3)
Key Takeaways:
- Query transformation (e.g., HyDE) significantly improves retrieval accuracy.
- Hybrid search balances keyword and semantic matching for robust results.
- Re-ranking refines top candidates post-retrieval for precision.
- Metadata/chunking strategies are critical for context preservation.
- LLM optimizations (prompt engineering, structured outputs) enhance final responses.
Limitations/Further Exploration:
- Computational Cost: Re-ranking and hybrid search add latency.
- Chunking Trade-offs: No one-size-fits-all solution; depends on data domain.
- LLM Dependence: RAG performance hinges on the base LLM’s capabilities.
- Future Directions: Dynamic chunking, lightweight re-rankers, and multi-modal RAG.
A comprehensive guide with practical tips on building robust RAG solutions.
This article was originally published on Daily Dose of Data Science
Visit Original Source